Author Archive for Alexey Gabsatarov

Facebook platform vs Google PR

In social networks we do not waste time - half a year in battle gets you a veteran’s badge.

Facebook has introduced it’s open platfrom about 6 months ago. Since than more that 70,000 developers lined up under its flags. About a month ago Google introduced its OpenSocial that is a direct competitor with Facebook’s platfrom. Small company with a lot of users an developers against a big company with not so many users and no developers. The stage is set.

The biggest threat to Facebook application platfrom and applications running on it is the Facebook itself. Or is it a benefit? Anyway, Facebook is a Microsoft of social networks. As long as people are on Facebook (willing to use Windows), applications are fine (application.exe are fine).
Google OpenSocial is a … no, it is not a Mac. It’s Linux. Open ( it’s even called open! ), container independent, not-so-evil as proprietary competitors. A lot of hype around it, a lot of flag waving and so on. But not so many real users and certainly not so many developers. But a lot of quality PR.

Classical example. Everyone will get a market share and probably Google will eventually get it all as Google usually do. But today Facebook and Bebo broke the rules of the game. Facebook licensed its platform to be used on other social network sites.

Maybe Facebook is not like Microsoft after all?

A brief history of search

Network information search has a short but exciting history. Let’s look at some trendsetters and heroes of search and try to see where this whole thing is going.

1) 1990 - Archie . Created by a few students at McGuill University in Montreal and designed to search for scientific documents. Archie was originally a local tool that grew to become network services based on FTP protocol. It has a trawler, index database and a search interface. Important limitation - it could only search for document titles.
Actually, you can still check it out. There is one that takes your search query and returns the list of results via e-mail. Neat!

[Archie picture]

Continue reading ‘A brief history of search’

It’s going to be a good year for the Social Web!

Promises Plaxo Chief Platfrom Architect Joseph Smarr. Plaxo is having an exciting romance with OpenSocial, boasting an impressive rise in connections number since OpenSocial introduction on 31st of October.

Plaxo Open Social

This is of course is pure announcement hype since non of OpenSocial partners has managed to produce any significant value to their users.Not yet that is.

How much is a social network user worth?

Or put differently, what value will one user bring to a social network itself or to a third-party application running on a social network platfrom?

Take Facebook – Adonomics evaluation renders an active user value at $270. This is how much value user brings to Facebook itself.

It is a bit more difficult with third-party applications running on social network platform. I have seen different views generally ranging from $0.30 to $1.

What do you think?

Battle royal

Beware, early social adopters! The giants are finally awake and are closing on each other on the social arena.

Google with OpenSocial, Microsoft with Cloud OS and IBM with Lotus Connections are exploring the domain from different angles but unavoidably arrive at the same point.

It is interesting that new Microsoft visionary Ray Ozzie who outlined a major change in company’s direction, is the Lotus Notes original creator. Lotus was later purchased by IBM and is being transformed into IBM social enterprise product Lotus Connections. It is a small world.

And finally a little spot the differences game. Social enterprise from Microsoft and IBM.
Presentations are taken via excellent LotusConnectionBlog.

Facebook poketology

I have to admit I am fascinated by facebook poke. And for the very simple reason – poke is a very social thing that did not and does not exist outside of social network context.

Since poking developed inside facebook, it is important to understand mechanisms behind poke to understand how social network works.

When an individual joins the group, it has two basic ways to get around unfamiliar environment – “trial and error” and “imitation”.

Trial and error treats the group as a part of the environment and explores it from the outside. Individual learns by acting and measuring subjective feedback from the action.
Imitation is much more powerful and robust as a social interaction. User acknowledges being part of the group and trusts the group. Instead of spending a lot of effort to establish what is socially acceptable using trial and error, users start imitating other users. After all, we are natural born imitators – why don’t we do what we do best?

In every dynamic group there will be still a fair amount of trial and errors and most successful attempts will set new trends. But there is no truly social interaction and there is no truly social network without imitation.

Let’s take poke. After a new user joins facebook and acquires a few facebook friends, she will be poked. Outside of facebook being poked (whatever the equivalent might be) by a complete stranger is at least confusing. Inside facebook one quickly learns that poking is normal and acceptable thing. If poking is normal, is there one way to use poke?

Facebook informs that poke is a cool feature without specific purpose. The same page suggests to invent own meaning of pocking. So in a best social sense, poke has provided facilities and left the usage and interpretation to the users. Some users set trends and the others follow.

Reflecting the diverse audience, there are currently 500+ user groups around meaning and usage of poke on facebook, ranging from pancakes to sex invitations. To be fair the pancakes group only managed to get 252 users against 332 thousands of “sex poke” supporters.

However, there are hundreds of poke usages that are a little bit more useful than pancakes invitations. The beauty is interpretation is entirely dependant on your friends demographic. And it could be a good idea to check what poke group they are on before poking back.

But remember that sometimes a poke is just a poke.

So what is your poke?

Why do you poke?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Under pressure

Social networks represent a way to simulate real interactions between people. Those interactions have always been and always will be there. Why social networks created so much hype around them lately?

Human is a social animal. Our very identities are shaped and defined by society we live in. We accept common wisdom of “Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are”.

Well, this is it. Social networks is a modus operandi to show our identities in a different way. Very powerful and reveling way I must add. The same way performing requires spectators, social networking requires exposing. This creates even more powerful phenomena of exposing social interactions by means of social interactions.

Peer pressure, huh? What about Facebook pressure? :)

Good night!

UserRank

To start with I’d like to share with you a link to link about interesting and relatively recent initiative by Six Apart and Google to open up the social graph. With the same people who engineered OpenId on board this is the place to watch.

Another article by Brad summarises what Google will probably attempt to archive in social networks.

Will the world be a better place with information about social contacts as accessible as a phone number? Will our trust to individual companies like Facebook and LinkedIn extend to the entire community? Will we have to exploit some Google UserRank hacks to increase our popularity?

With our social environment pretty much shaping and defining personal identity the importance and impact of global and open social graph cannot be overstated.

Let’s turn this page in the humanity history book and see where will it take us!

Hello social world!

nice and social browser